logo

50 pages 1 hour read

John Cleland

Fanny Hill

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1748

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Frances “Fanny” Hill

Fanny is the author of the letters that comprise the novel, writing about her years as a sex worker after the fact to an unnamed acquaintance. In the present of the novel, Fanny reveals at the end of Letter 2, that she is wealthy and married to Charles, with whom she has children. Because of her social position, she can reflect on her youth without shame or embarrassment. The course of the novel, then, follows Fanny’s development from innocence through the trials of sex work in London, concluding with Fanny fully developing into a wise and experienced woman at the end of the novel. Cleland’s novel paints her as a version of the hero archetype, in that Fanny is on a quest to succeed in life, love, and sexuality over the course of her tribulations in London.

The narrative of Fanny’s life shows how a young woman from the country might overcome the social, sexual, and economic barriers of English society through “vice,” highlighting the three options available to 18th-century British women: marriage, religion, and sex work. The conflict between marriage and sex work forms the foundation of Fanny’s struggles in London, as she and her friends focus more on being “kept,” or supported financially, by men, rather than marrying them. Even at the end of Fanny’s story, when she has a fortune of her own, she proposes giving her money to Charles so that he can “keep” her, seemingly not realizing that she could marry him. Fanny’s growth in the novel is centered on her gradual realization of the unfair ways society treats women, and, in the end, she is in the best possible position for a woman without noble birth, which is married and wealthy.

The purpose of Fanny’s narrative is revealed in the final portion of the novel, in which she notes how “Mr. C— O—, […] when anxious for his son’s morals, […] led him by the hand thro’ the most noted bawdy-houses in town” to teach him all the forms and styles of vice (123). Fanny’s journey follows this same trajectory, in that Fanny enters London with no experience in either practiced vice or virtue, learns through experience all the forms of vice, and concludes the novel in the image of virtue, married with children. Though the final moral, which claims that the novel is intended to bring the reader on the same journey, is likely satirical, Fanny’s character growth follows this line of thinking, and her character is rooted in an honest exploration of sexuality, morality, and the economic challenges faced by women.

Charles

Charles is Fanny’s love interest in the novel, though he only appears at the beginning and end of the novel. Charles fulfills some important tropes and expectations of 18th-century literature, and he reveals the major differences between the lived experiences of men and women during this time. Charles is wealthy by birth, though he is not a noble, and his father resents the fact that Charles’s maternal grandmother prefers Charles to his father. Charles is absent from most of the novel because his father sends him to the South Seas in an attempt to secure his grandmother’s money. However, when Charles returns to England, he loses his money in an accident, leaving him in the same position as Fanny at the beginning of the novel. Meeting Fanny by accident, she becomes his savior by marrying him and bringing to the marriage the fortune she inherited from her final client.

Charles’s character is based on the 18th-century figure of the “rake” or libertine, a young man with money who engages in the vices of sexuality, drugs, and alcohol. The libertine trope, exemplified in Restoration and 18th-century literature by characters like Wilmore in Aphra Behn’s play The Rover or Lovelace in Samuel Richardson’s Clarissa, was celebrated in the Restoration but was usually deployed to show the pitfalls of immorality in the 18th-century. Charles undergoes a transformation befitting this shift. Rather than continuing a life of debauchery in London, he seems dedicated to Fanny in the early portion of their relationship, and he quickly marries her upon his return. Though it can be argued that he married Fanny for money, the novel frames their marriage as a return to virtue for both characters, resolving in Fanny’s comments regarding the superiority of pleasure through virtue, rather than through vice.

Charles shows how destitution is a fundamentally different experience for men and women in 18th-century literature. Unlike Fanny, who, without parents or wealth, is forced into sex work, Charles, returning to England without any money, plans to start over in London. Neither Charles’s vices nor poverty follow him in his life, as he can still get married, get a job, or return to a life of debauchery without harsh criticisms from society as a whole. This opportunity to start over contrasts with Fanny, who can only overcome her history in sex work by marrying the first man she slept with, and who can only accumulate wealth through men.

Mrs. Brown, Mrs. Jones, and Mrs. Cole

Though there are many property owners and managers in the text, Mrs. Brown, Mrs. Jones, and Mrs. Cole exemplify different subversions of the archetype of older women as compassionate caregivers. Mrs. Brown is the first figure to subvert this archetype, as she appears to save Fanny from the employment office by offering her a role as an assistant, which Fanny later discovers requires her to do sex work at Mrs. Brown’s brothel. Mrs. Brown is the only older woman in such a position who seems to acknowledge any wrongdoing, as shown by her nervous reaction to Charles’s friend, the lawyer. Mrs. Brown’s interests, like those of Mrs. Jones and Mrs. Cole, are primarily tied to money, and Mrs. Brown, rather than seeking to support and help Fanny, is instead trying to indoctrinate her into sex work for her own financial gain.

Mrs. Jones, unlike Mrs. Brown and Mrs. Cole, does not specifically operate in sex work, instead functioning as a tertiary contact in the transfer from Fanny being “kept” by Charles to being “kept” by Mr. H. However, Mrs. Jones is likely the greediest of the three women in this section, as she has only the slightest pretense of helping Fanny, whereas Mrs. Brown and Mrs. Cole invite Fanny into their homes without payment. When Charles leaves, Mrs. Jones extorts Fanny for as much money as possible before allowing her to leave, effectively selling Fanny to Mr. H. During the time that Charles and Fanny spend together, Mrs. Jones extorts them as well, but the subversion of the caregiver archetype comes in Mrs. Jones’s specific targeting of Fanny as an easy source of income.

Mrs. Cole is the closest character to a true caregiver in the text, as she supports Fanny, Louisa, Harriet, and Emily both financially and emotionally. The key difference between Mrs. Cole and her predecessors is that she allows Fanny and the other women to keep the gifts and payments they earn through their sex work. She also teaches the women about frugality, helping Fanny accumulate 800 pounds by the time Mrs. Cole retires. From an 18th-century perspective, Mrs. Cole is still a subversion of the caregiver stereotype because she is organizing and profiting from women’s sexual exploitation. From a modern perspective, though, Mrs. Cole can be interpreted as a more genuinely compassionate and generous character.

Louisa, Emily, and Harriet

Though Louisa, Emily, and Harriet are only present during Letter 2, they form an important part of the social commentary of the novel. They are paired with a group of men, some of whom are noblemen, but the men are interchangeable, whereas Louisa, Emily, and Harriet have distinct experiences that inform their entry into sex work. Emily’s story is most closely related to Fanny’s, as she left her country town as a young girl, met a man on the road, and pursued a sexual relationship with him without getting married. When he left her, she was forced into sex work, following 18th-century conventions. Emily is a kind of double of Fanny, in which Fanny’s man is Charles, and both women show how adolescent romance is a matter of course for men but can become a socially devastating event for young women.

Louisa is the most unique of the women because she falls into the archetype of the “nymphet,” a term most popularly associated with Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita, but which has ties to Ancient Greek mythology. Nymphs were often portrayed as young, seemingly innocent girls who seduce men. Louisa is characterized by an early development of sexual interest, culminating in her seducing a young man while her mother is away from home. Louisa’s inclusion in the novel shows that many women involved in sex work do so out of pleasure and enjoyment of sex, rather than out of necessity, though the inclusion of her sexual proclivity in her early teen years is problematic for a modern reader.

Harriet is the victim of sexual assault, the repercussions of which result in her involvement in sex work. Harriet is consistently characterized as modest and innocent despite her profession, and her story of losing her virginity is the only one that involves a total removal of consent. Following the motif linking virginity and love, Harriet both forgives and falls in love with the man who assaults her, but her story has a broader significance. Through much of English history, sexual assault was seen as damaging to the woman’s reputation rather than to the man’s. Notable exceptions include Chaucer’s The Wife of Bath’s Tale, in which a man is punished for committing sexual assault, but, for the most part, sexual assault was seen as causing damage to another man’s property, meaning Harriet’s lack of parents, siblings, or a husband removes the conventional “victims” from the crime. Nonetheless, the lasting impact on Harriet’s reputation leads to her inclusion in Mrs. Cole’s home. Her story lays bare the devastating consequences of society’s hypocritical, misogynistic moral standards about sexuality.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text