34 pages • 1 hour read
Chris HedgesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Hedges blames elite higher education institutions for many of the problems facing the United States. Such institutions care less about teaching students critical thinking skills than they do about preparing such students to become “competent systems managers” (89). Elite institutions discourage independent intellectual inquiry and instead promote learning broken up into highly specialized disciplines and vocabularies. These divisions make collective understanding amongst disciplines difficult.
Hedges interviews Henry Giroux, an English and Cultural Studies professor at McMaster University. Giroux is an outspoken critic of the university’s role in what he refers to as the “military-industrial-academic complex” (91). According to Giroux, an intimate relationship exists between universities, corporations, and governments. He claims that “corporate and Pentagon money was now funding research projects, and increasingly knowledge was being militarized in the service of developing weapons of destruction, surveillance, and death” (91).
According to a student at UC Berkeley, relatively little political action or interest is observable on campus. Instead, students are fragmented into separate groups according to ethnicity and professional focus. The corporate influence is blatantly obvious, however, thanks to Berkeley’s interest in cultivating corporate relationships. For example, Berkeley displays its corporate affiliations publicly. Coca-Cola is sold exclusively at football games, and Cingular and Allstate advertise at California Memorial Stadium. In 1997, British Petroleum and UC Berkeley struck a deal to research biofuels using the university’s resources.
The specialized groups at Berkeley that determine social behavior can be observed in other institutes of higher education. Hedges finds that he is unable to understand the academic jargon used by a former classmate at Harvard Divinity School. Such language prevents understanding and access across specialties, keeping each specialty “locked in its narrow role” (98).
Students admitted to elite universities are often part of an exclusive class that has its own language and code of behavior. Members of this class live in exclusive communities and have little contact with others outside of their circle.
Though elite schools claim to be committed to diversity, diversity at elite schools is often measured by race rather than class. Students without financial resources rarely have access to higher education, and a family’s finances is often linked to race. Schools such as Yale and Harvard admit many students each year who are the children of alumni or the children of those who make significant donations to the university.
Hedges explains that the failure of the American economy is a direct result of the neglect of the humanities in higher education. Leaders in charge of the political and economic systems think primarily in narrow terms which uphold that same systems. These leaders are not capable of thinking in new ways which would help overthrow the system. Students who train in these institutions and neglect the study of humanities become afraid to take risks. They learn from their universities that what matters most is making money and getting ahead, rather than thinking critically and challenging the systems in charge. Hedges predicts that if society fails to understand the forces at work beneath political appearances, then “we will be cursed with a more ruthless form of corporate power, one that does away with artifice and the seduction of a consumer society, and wields power through naked repression” (90).
While the humanities are in decline at colleges and universities, majors that provide vocational training are on the rise. Hedges compares universities to “high priced occupational training centers” (109). While liberal arts schools close, for-profit universities such as The University of Phoenix and DeVry continue to grow in popularity. Such schools only provide job training for students.
In the end, Hedges determines that “moral autonomy” (112) is necessary to resist evil, yet moral autonomy is precisely what the corporate university complex seeks to eliminate in its students.
Citing Theodor Adorno, Hedges links the seriousness of these changes in higher education to the devastating effects of the Holocaust. He explains that institutions that teach skills without teaching values creates societies where “another Auschwitz” (90) is possible. As Hedges outlines in Chapter 3, elite higher education institutions are not promoting the values or tools for critical thinking that would be necessary to avoid such a “ruthless” (90) corporate power from coming into effect.
Hedges cites the example of an elite institution like UC Berkeley to demonstrate the intimate relationships between universities and corporations. Hedges includes these details to suggest that even formerly radical, left-leaning, politically-engaged institutions such as Berkeley have fallen under corporate influence. This ties into a larger theme in Empire of Illusion, in which Hedges points out that the political left have fallen prey to the corrupting influences as often as those who represent the political right.
Hedges has experience at elite institutions as both a student and a teacher, and he has found that students have often been told that they are “the best” and that they are “entitled to the best” (98). Men such as George W. Bush embody this attitude of entitlement and expectation. Access to this experience of privilege and entitlement, however, is blocked to students who do not have the means to pay for it. In this way, elite institutions’ commitment to diversity is hypocritical. Instead, such institutions serve to perpetuate power and wealth for families who have already obtained power and wealth.
Hedges is concerned that higher education institutions fail to teach students how to think critically or morally, which could have dangerous consequences. Universities, however, continue to churn out workers who only specialize in “management techniques” (103) and analytical thinking. Such students have learned that making money is the only measurement for success. The critical thinking skills that are necessary for the development of ideas which challenge the status quo, rather than simply serving it, are worryingly absent. Hedges contends that in modern times, an overhaul of the economic and political systems is necessary to stave off disaster, yet universities continue to train thinkers who only perpetuate the systems in which they were trained. As corporations continue to fund universities and influence its activities, students will continue to learn to think in ways that serve these same corporations.
Professors, like Hedges himself, whose livelihoods are increasingly threatened by poor pay and adjunct positions, are in no position to wage a campaign against the growing corporatization of the university. Meanwhile, the leaders of important political and economic institutions are unlikely to provide alternative courses of action, as they too have been trained in corporate and elite universities dedicated to maintaining the status quo. For all of these reasons, Hedges predicts an utter collapse of the financial system.