logo

59 pages 1 hour read

John Webster

The Duchess of Malfi

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1614

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Transcending Societal Expectations

The antagonists of the play believe in the maintenance of a strict social hierarchy in which they—rich, noble Italian males—have absolute power and everyone else is arranged below them. However, the play is sympathetic to the characters who transcend the societal expectations laid out for their class and gender.

Under the rule of King James I, women’s roles in society were even more tightly monitored than they had been in Elizabeth’s time. This was partially due to a backlash instigated by James against this long-ruled and popular female monarch. James imagined that England would relish the return of a king, when in fact they had accrued a national identity under Elizabeth and distrusted his Scottishness. He developed a reputation for dismissing the queen’s memory as well as general misogyny. Whereas Elizabeth had used accessible discourse to appeal to the middle and lower classes, James was raised in the more feudalistic Scotland and maintained strict social stratification under his rule.

Thus, matters of gender and class are bound up together, as are matters of transcending the traditional expectations for these roles. It is the Duchess’s transgression of traditional gender roles—like Elizabeth’s queenly model of accessibility—that facilitates Antonio’s transgression of class barriers. She is the one asking for his hand; as she says, her social status dictates that “We are forced to woo, because none dare woo us” (I.1.442). She must make romantic advances that are not typical of high-ranking females. However, in doing so and in having Antonio accept her offer, she and Antonio transcend class barriers in turn. As he kneels on the floor, the Duchess says, “This goodly roof of yours is too low built; / I cannot stand upright in’t, nor discourse / Without I raise it higher” (I.1.416-18). Though the Duchess tells Antonio his “goodly roof” is too low as a way of asking him to stand upright so she can speak to him easier, she is also saying that he is making too little of himself on account of his class and that he should rise and speak to her as an equal.

Contrary to the Duchess, Ferdinand and the Cardinal’s masculine traditionality makes them resistant to these intertwined transgressions. In Act I Scene 1, the Cardinal and Ferdinand warn the Duchess against remarrying. They emphasize that her social class is the reason she cannot bestow romantic favor on anyone. Ferdinand says that she must not let “youth, high promotion, eloquence” woo her, and the Cardinal continues, “No, nor anything without the addition, honour, / Sway your high blood” (I.1.295-97). They say that she must not let any combination of desirable attributes romantically sway her if someone does not have the “addition” of an honorable title. When they find out that the Duchess has married below her class anyway, the Cardinal is upset that their “royal blood of Aragon and Castile” is now “attainted” (II.5.22-23). Likewise, Ferdinand defaults to calling the Duchess’s children “cubs” and “young wolves” to dehumanize them.

The Cardinal and Ferdinand are the play’s clear antagonists while the Duchess and Antonio are morally good and sympathetic. As such, Webster implicitly criticizes the move toward traditional class and gender hierarchy in Jacobean England, suggesting that true virtue and worth are about moral values, not social rank. As Bosola remarks, “I would not change my peace of conscience / For all the wealth of Europe” (IV.2.339-40)—in other words, it is better to prize virtue above rank, wealth, and titles.

Corruption, Deceit, and Betrayal

While they seem to be three distinct phenomena, corruption, deceit, and betrayal all have to do with the early modern anxiety that someone’s outside appearance or behavior is disguising or misrepresenting what is inside them. This anxiety particularly manifests in the nature of the court and the male characters’ suspicions about women. As such, this theme is tied to Transcending Societal Expectations.

At various points, Bosola, the Cardinal, and Ferdinand all invoke the deceitful nature of women. Bosola uses this misconception to fuel his misogynist attack on the Old Lady: he tells a story of a woman who “flayed the skin off her face” to flatten her smallpox scars (II.1.30) and uses this to extrapolate the idea that all women will try to appear as something they are not. The Cardinal similarly insults his mistress, Julia: though he is breaking his religious vows by having a sexual relationship with her, he weaponizes her infidelity to her husband to characterize all women as deceitful. Finally, Ferdinand does the same with the Duchess: He interprets the hiding of her marriage as deceitful and believes she has betrayed her promise not to remarry.

These generalized misogynistic accusations are not founded. They are largely a projection by the brothers, who are characterized by their penchant for actual corruption and deceit. This characterization sets the tone for the rest of the court. Antonio says that “flashes superficially hang” on the Cardinal (I.1.156), deceiving the court’s flatterers. Likewise, he says that what appears in Ferdinand as “mirth is merely outside” (I.1.170, emphasis added), disguising a dishonest and corrupted internal character. The corrupt and deceptive nature of Ferdinand and the Cardinal then extends to the court at large. As Antonio explains to Delio, “if ‘t chance / Some cursed example poison ‘t near the head, / Death and diseases through the whole land spread” (I.1.14-15). This metaphor of the “head” of a fountain is used to describe the nature of the court, which takes its corrupt nature from the nobles who run it.

Even the protagonists of the play, the Duchess and Antonio, exhibit deceitful behavior. What distinguishes them from the play’s antagonists is that their deceit is not born from a corrupt personality but rather, out of necessity amid the ethos of the court. If they want to follow their hearts and live as husband and wife, they must engage in deceit by hiding their marriage and family. Since the corruption of the court follows from two of its most prominent nobles, Ferdinand and the Cardinal, their biases come to dictate that of the environment that surrounds them. The Duchess references this when she tells Cariola that she is “going into a wilderness / Where I shall find nor path nor friendly clew / To be my guide” (I.1.359-61). In the wilderness of the deceitful court, she must paradoxically engage in deceit herself in order to live her most honest life.

Notably, every character who engages in deceitful behavior—be they protagonist or antagonist—dies before the end of the play. A corrupt nature, which leads to deceit, eventually leads to a series of betrayals that result in a litany of deaths. In a tragedy, the final soliloquy given after the last flurry of character deaths often summarizes the lesson of the play. Delio’s soliloquy is about truth, the opposite of deceit. He says, “Nature doth nothing so great, for great men / As when she’s pleased to make them lords of truth” (V.5.118-19, emphasis added). Because the characters of a court’s “great men” determine the character of the court at large, whether someone is truthful or deceitful determines the fate of an array of people. At its core, corruption, deceit, and the betrayals that follow are what make this play a tragedy.

The Link Between Inner and Outer Maladies

The Duchess of Malfi makes frequent reference to a variety of diseases, treatments, and medicines, both in metaphorical and literal contexts. While these references heighten the tragedy’s dramatic tension, they also indicate a breadth of beliefs early modern people had regarding disease and treatment. Most significantly, the play uses the outward manifestation of maladies to hint at problems of corruption and conscience within the play’s characters.

The play contains many references to early modern humoral theory, which has its roots in Ancient Greece. This theory held that the body was composed of four “humors,” each represented by a specific fluid and set of characteristics: black bile (melancholy: moodiness, sadness, depression), yellow bile (choleric: ambition, aggression, short temper, irrational), blood (sanguine: active, social, enthusiastic) and phlegm (phlegmatic: slow, quiet, constant). All diseases were understood to be caused by imbalances of these humors. Immoderate personalities were also attributed to an excess in one of these humors, and in early modern theatre, the rhetoric of humoral theory is often used for characterization. When Antonio meets Bosola, he says:

This foul melancholy
Will poison his goodness, for—I’ll tell you—
If too immoderate sleep be truly said
To be an inward rust unto the soul,
It then doth follow want of action
Breeds all black malcontents (I.1.75-80).

Antonio thinks that Bosola’s melancholy will “poison” him. He concludes that it is caused by “want of action”: languishing in court, he believes, heightens Bosola’s melancholy. This is also informed by the fact that melancholy was seen as in-vogue for noble men. Ferdinand says that Bosola’s melancholy will “express / You envy those that stand above your reach” (I.1.278-79, emphasis added), thereby accusing Bosola of affecting his melancholy to seem of higher status than he is. In reality, Bosola’s “foul melancholy” is an outward manifestation of his inward dissatisfaction: He has committed murder on the Cardinal’s orders and remains dependent upon those who use him without ever fully honoring their end of the deal. As the play progresses, Bosola’s conscience troubles him more and more until, towards the play’s end, he openly confesses his regrets, revealing the true cause and nature of his “melancholy.”

Similarly, Ferdinand’s inner guilt manifests in his outward lycanthropy after the Duchess’s murder. This is a troubling moment in the play, where it uses a technique that modern critics David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder call “narrative prosthesis.” This is when disability, disease, or other forms of “non-normativity” are used as a characterization device to illustrate a personality trait or moral arc. In this model, disability is used as a metaphor: a “bad” character will have an outward disability that is meant to signal their inner “badness.” Ferdinand’s lycanthropy is meant to symbolize his “animalistic” nature: The play suggests that by perpetuating violence and deceit even against his own sister, he has behaved in a way that is lacking in humanity, with his guilt therefore driving him to see and experience himself as a wild beast. His belief that he has been transformed into a wolf is also an ironic inversion of his earlier attempts to dehumanize the Duchess’s children by dismissing them as “young wolves” who deserved to die: “The death / Of young wolves is never to be pitied” (IV.2.257-58, emphasis added). In this way, Webster uses outward manifestations of melancholy or mental illness to hint at the inner conflicts and guilty consciences the play’s antagonists experience within themselves.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By John Webster