50 pages • 1 hour read
Fredrik BackmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The bridge is a primary symbol throughout the novel that represents different things according to the character or timeline. For Jack, Zara, and Nadia, the bridge initially symbolizes despair. Jack was unable to save the man who jumped from the bridge, and that moment still haunts him 10 years later. The bridge represents a personal failure for Jack. Zara views the bridge similarly. She carries guilt over the man on the bridge’s death, and whenever she looks at the bridge, she experiences a visceral reaction to that guilt. Nadia once stood on the edge of the bridge and contemplated suicide, and afterward, the bridge became a symbol of the knowledge that she once almost died by choice. However, these characters’ views of the bridge change after the hostage situation.
Roger is the only character with an initially hopeful view of bridges. He once built bridges and believes they “exist to move people closer together” (253). His opinion eventually becomes reality for Jack, Zara, and Nadia. After they leave the hostage drama, they realize that the bridge that once haunted them now connects them. Jack makes peace with his guilt over the man on the bridge’s death after he learns that he saved Nadia’s life on that same bridge. Zara makes peace with the bridge as well when she realizes that the man on the bridge didn’t blame her for his death. Zara’s encouraging words to Nadia—that she saved herself on that bridge, not Jack who saved her—help Nadia see that she’s no longer a danger to herself; the metaphorical bridge in her mind isn’t a means to die but a lifeline connecting her to others. The bridge is therefore intertwined with the Connection Between Anxiety and “Idiocy”, as it transforms from a symbol of anxiety-fueled desperation to desperation-fueled connection.
The apartment is a symbolic space that brings unlikely characters together and gives them the room and time to realize their connectedness. Each character enters the apartment with deep personal and familial anxieties. Each of these anxieties stems from the worry that they’re not good enough or worthy of their relationships, their children, or their lives. The apartment technically belongs to Estelle, who keeps this fact hidden for most of the novel, but during the hostage situation, each character makes a part of the apartment their own. Anna-Lena, Julia, and Estelle spend a large portion of the hostage drama in the closet together. This enclosed space allows the women to open up about their deepest fears and anxieties in their marriages. Roger, the bank robber, and Ro spend time together in the hallway, enabling them to consider their identities in relation to the ones they love. They each realize that they don’t feel worthy of love, yet this shared epiphany makes them realize that they aren’t alone in their feelings; this encourages them to move beyond their self-loathing. Zara and Lennart connect on the balcony, which symbolizes how they are both outsiders. As a place of apparent imprisonment that brings people together, the apartment therefore represents the relationships between “Stockholm Syndrome,” Captivity, and Empathy.
When Jack and Jim first enter the apartment complex after the hostages’ release, they find what appears to be a child’s drawing. The bank robber’s daughters created the drawing, and it symbolizes their life together. However, this picture continually takes on new meaning as the different characters try to interpret the images. Jack and Jim argue regarding what animal the image looks like, and Jack believes that somehow the drawing is integral to the case. This is true, but not in the way he believes: The picture reflects the bank robber’s motivation for robbing the bank in the first place.
Notably, no other character can interpret this drawing except for London, which suggests her broader clarity of perception. She correctly guesses the animals in the drawing, and she’s the only one who gives Jack a useful detail regarding the case. The narrator is making the commentary that looks can be deceiving, developing the theme of Challenging Preconceptions. Although London appears young and self-absorbed on the outside, she is wise enough to correctly spot the facts in front of her.
By Fredrik Backman