logo

18 pages 36 minutes read

Wisława Szymborska

A Little Girl Tugs at the Tablecloth

Fiction | Poem | Adult | Published in 2002

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Transgression and Brutality

Like many of Szymborska’s narrators, this speaker charms without revealing a full picture of character or nature. Readers might be suspicious of this voice describing the unfolding of domestic disaster with mild glee, without any interest or motivation to preserve the safety of objects or child. The speaker portrays a courageous girl coming into a sense of power and identity, issues central to Eastern European literature of the 20th century, as writers grappled with the loss of cultural identity and agency. Little girls in literature traditionally represent innocence, and in this case, that innocence frees her from societal expectations and even the rules of physics, as “Mr. Newton still has no say in this” (Line 23). Intellectual and cultural taboos have not yet raised “unyielding walls” (Line 10) in this world. Her freedom cannot be sidelined, and her intention to complete her investigation must not be thwarted.

In one reading of the speaker’s voice, this story depicts human potential for anarchic joy and abandon before definitions, politics, and rules intervene. However, the child in the poem might as easily represent a kind of mindless, brutal tyranny exacted on innocent bystanders, swept into a pointless experiment benefitting nothing and no one. The child possesses the physical strength to move enough items to cause things to break; therefore, she must exert that force and break things. At first, the inanimate objects are “shaking with desire” (Line 16), but by the time they cling to the table’s edge, they are “trembling” (Line 19); they are at the mercy of a blind mission. Considered within the political struggles experienced in Szymborska’s lifetime, from Poland’s harrowing survival through World War II to her own disillusionment with the Communist party in Poland, this kind of childish, clumsy destruction acquires a grim futility as the speaker confirms the necessity of the experiment’s unfolding.

Agency and Motion

Two kinds of motion drive the poem. One kind of motion comes from human agency, intentional and causal. Another movement represents an irresistible, universal force, something that will effect change beyond human control. For Szymborska, having lived in Poland during some of its most volatile political eras, these two forces present a constant potential for chaos and fracture. The little girl encounters her own agency, narrated by the speaker, as she practices the effect of her actions. She can move objects when “[t]hey need to be helped along” (Line 6), demonstrating her exertion of choice and her physical mastery of the objects in her world.

The speaker, but not the little girl, realizes that no set of decisions or beliefs can reconcile these two motions in the world; often the acts we commit on purpose result in unintended consequences. As readers, we know, along with the sly speaker of the poem, that the little girl will bring the objects crashing to the floor. The speaker does not intervene. In fact, her intervention would be meaningless; as if to represent the indifferent universe watching humans destroy their own environments without forethought, the speaker asserts that the costly “experiment” that the little girl conducts “must be completed” (Line 25). To seal the point, the speaker ends with the final, short line “And it will” (Line 26), confirming that some motions might appear as personal agency but play a role in a greater unfolding of fate or nature.

Testing, Experimentation, and Faith

Many Eastern European writers turned to science fiction or folktale-style narratives to approximate the absurdity of the incomprehensibility and irrationality of war and its aftermath. On a smaller scale, Szymborska finds a way to address the irrational in “A Little Girl Tugs at the Tablecloth.” For adults listening to a speaker with the vocabulary of an adult, many of the poem’s suppositions seem either whimsical or absurd. However, the premise for these irrational statements, according to the speaker, serves the toddler’s narrative of experimentation. Guided back to the uncertainty of childhood, we imagine again what it would be like to wonder if, liberated from the tabletop, the inanimate items might “fly around the lamp” (Line 21), as if they could choose their own paths. Szymborska, through the observing but not interfering speaker and the intrepid child, creates a world of possibility, maybe a world with different rules than ours. In the opening lines, the speaker claims “this world” (Lines 1 and 2) constitutes a place where “not everything’s been examined” (Line 2). This world offers a second chance at reality, but in that possible alternate world, there exists the chance for less sense as well. Inanimate objects with intentions of their own might prove hostile; a toddler without regard for rules might interpret the results of her experiments in ways that create a tyrant. For Szymborska, the idea that anything can be possible represents both hope and a threat. Either way, the speaker and therefore the reader can only witness the results of the test, one for which we already know the results. If the results don’t match our expectations based on our own experience, then our understanding of the world and its realities destabilizes. “Mr. Newton” (Line 23), replacing God in “the heavens” (Line 24), can’t help us. We remain witnesses, awaiting inevitable results.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text